|
WITH BRAINS ENGAGED: Dr
Balakrishnan urged the 2,000 RI students in his dialogue on new
media to be wary of spurious claims and flashy publicity stunts on
the Internet, an arena where 'more heat than light is generated'.
-- ST PHOTO: ALBERT SIM
|
WHEN Dr Vivian Balakrishnan gazed into a crystal ball yesterday on
how the Internet would change local politics, three visions popped
up.
They were: more diverse views, louder political discourse and
politicians delivering their messages in stylish, short multimedia
packages, a phenomenon he labelled 'YouTube politics'.
But this future is fraught with pitfalls, the Minister for
Community Development, Youth and Sports told students of Raffles
Institution, which had invited him to give a talk on new media and
its impact on politics.
As he spelt them out to the 2,000 students, he urged them to use
their heads when reading online: 'In the midst of such an
exponential growth in information, determining what is true or
false is going to be extremely difficult... I have no easy answer
except to ask you to be sceptical and to think and be careful.'
To illustrate one pitfall, he pointed to those who still believe
that the sun revolves around the earth: 'Because you have an
interconnected world, people with far-out ideas, or even wrong
ideas, will be able to find someone who also believes the sun
revolves around the earth and reinforces those beliefs.'
A diversity of views did not always end up in a 'fundamental
truth'. New media allows wrong ideas to be reinforced, he said.
It also raises the pitch of political discourse owing to perceived
anonymity online. 'Because you think you are not revealing
yourself, a lot of people on the Internet engage in what I call
virtual shouting.
'They want to gain attention and the best way...is to say
something crazy, outrageous, scandalous, maybe even defamatory,' he
said. 'It is a world in which more heat than light is
generated.'
As for YouTube politics, the minister spelt out what he saw as
the new demands on how a politician today has to communicate.
On radio, politicians had to be good orators. TV required good
soundbites. New media adds another criterion: style, even in place
of substance.
'It's no longer enough to talk, you must have moving images, you
must have sound, you must have music. It must be packaged into no
more than three minutes.
'If it's something true but boring...no one's going to watch
it.'
But in opening their eyes to potential problems, Dr Balakrishnan
stressed that he was not out to 'indict the future' but to get them
to be more discerning.
'These are just trends, trends that you and I need to think
about, need to understand, need to know how to use,' he said.
He returned to this message in the question-and-answer session
that followed.
When asked how one should be discerning in the digital age, he
told the students to 'read with your brain engaged'.
'I'm always flabbergasted when someone stands up and says: 'Oh I
read in this blog that so-and-so did this.' We pronounce it as if
it was a discovered truth.
'How many of us bothered to say: 'Wait, who said it, where was
it published, are you sure it's accurate?' That whole layer of
homework which is needed is not done.'
The remarks began a lively dialogue, duringwhich the minister
fielded 16 questions ranging from political apathy to press
freedom. One was on how the People's Action Party (PAP) viewed the
challenge of new media.
He said the Government had no problems with it: 'There is no
dirty little secret which the PAP is trying to hide from its people
and that's why the Government is actually very comfortable with new
media.
'That's why we are investing hundreds of millions in
infrastructure which will connect us to the Internet, that's why we
invest so much money into making sure every student, every family
has a computer that's connected to the Internet.'
jeremyau@sph.com.sg
|