Some Cautionary Notes on Vivisimo
In a recent issue of Resourceshelf.com, I spotted a link to a
Pittsburgh Business Times
article on Vivisimo, a popular meta-search engine, and about
profitability of the Vivisimo
meta-search engine "test bed" which demonstrates Vivisimo's
clustering technology. Profitability, they say? Time to take
another look at Vivisimo's public meta search engine.
At the heart of Vivisimo's popularity is its excellent
clustering technology, which is also used to facilitate targeted
search in many other online products. Raves about Vivisimo's
clustering has brought many users to its public meta-search
site.
But a closer look at the underlying databases used by Vivisimo
show it as a substandard meta-search tool for serious searchers.
It's default web search databases (MSN, Lycos, Looksmart, Wisenut,
Open Directory, and Overture) are generally agreed to be
less-than-stellar choices in their respective categories. Overture
and Looksmart are almost exclusively pay-for-placement products.
Lycos is now principally Yahoo's Inktomi database with added
sponsored links; the Open Directory is generally agreed to be an
occasionally useful directory, but crowded with commercial content
because of its preferential treatment in Google's algorithms.
Wisenut is owned by Looksmart, and according to Search Engine
Showdown, it has one of the smallest databases of all the
spidered search engines.
Conclusion? No wonder Vivisimo is boasting of profitability --
most of its source database partners are pay-for players. According
to the article, Vivisimo earns 35% of its revenue from paid
placement and advertising on its public web site.
Vivisimo's story isn't really new -- many search engines
(including Google and the original Altavista) have in the past used
their public web search utilities as test beds to promote their
technology, only to soon discover that there was more money in
search than in selling the technology outright.
I like Vivisimo's clustering technology a lot. But it's
important for serious searchers to understand that even great
technology will produce poor results if the underlying databases
aren't good. In Vivisimo's case, paid content in, (clustered) paid
content out.